The well-known browser plugin Honey, which PayPal purchased for $4 billion in 2020, became the focus of the Honey Influencer Scam controversy in late 2024. Since its 2012 launch, Honey, a free service that helps internet customers locate the greatest coupons and discounts across thousands of websites, has grown in popularity.
Scam Overview
Initial Contact
Partnerships with content artists and influencer marketing were key components of Honey's expansion strategy. In order to promote their browser extension, the company approached well-known bloggers, social media influencers, and YouTubers with expensive sponsorship packages. Honey's promise to offer their audience a free tool that may save money on online purchases drew in these influencers, many of whom had millions of followers.
Typically, the first presentation emphasized Honey's user-friendliness, big discount code database, and possible savings for customers. Influencers were urged to produce material that illustrated Honey's operation, frequently highlighting instant discounts on well-known e-commerce sites. This strategy not only gave Honey legitimacy by using reliable voices, but it also made use of the influencers' existing connections with their audiences to generate an effective word-of-mouth advertising campaign that quickly increased Honey's user base.
Deception Techniques
- Honey allegedly hijacks affiliate links used by influencers.
- The extension replaces influencer tracking cookies with its own, even when no coupons are found.
- Honey claims to find the best deals but allegedly prioritizes partner-approved coupons over better available discounts.
Execution
- Cookie Manipulation: Honey's browser extension intervenes during the checkout process, replacing the original affiliate's tracking cookie with its own. This action effectively hijacks the commission that would have gone to the content creator or influencer who initially referred the customer.
- Last-Click Attribution Exploitation: Honey capitalizes on the "last-click wins" model common in affiliate marketing. The extension prompts users to perform additional clicks, such as activating rewards or applying coupons, even when no valid discounts are available. These unnecessary interactions ensure Honey receives credit for the sale.
- Cashback Incentivization: To encourage users to allow this commission redirection, Honey offers a cashback-like reward system called Honey Gold (now PayPal Rewards). Users receive minimal points in exchange for letting Honey claim the full commission, which is often worth significantly more than the rewards given to users.
Red Flags and Warning Signs
- Differences between Honey incentives and influencer earnings for same purchases.
- Better coupon codes available elsewhere when Honey claims to offer the best deal.
- Honey's terms of use state they might not always find the best deal.
Detection and Discovery
The breakdown of the Honey controversy can be attributed to an in depth investigation by YouTuber MegaLag. By December 30, 2024, MegaLag's exposé video, "Exposing the Honey Influencer Scam," had received over 13 million views. The video was uploaded on December 21, 2024. After a multi-year research that included examining hundreds of documents, examining commercials, and speaking with numerous industry stakeholders, this video was the end product.
Growing suspicions among content creators further drove the discovery process. For example, Linus Tech Tips terminated its collaboration with Honey in 2022 because of issues with the way the business handled affiliate links. Similarly, as early as 2020, Markiplier voiced mistrust of Honey due to the company's questionable financials. Increased examination of Honey's business practices resulted from influencers and content producers observing differences between their anticipated income and actual commissions, which further sparked the debate.
Impact Analysis
- Financial losses for influencers and content creators in missed commissions
- Potential financial impact on consumers who may not receive the best available discounts
- Damage to trust between influencers and their audiences
Response and Resolution
- A class-action lawsuit was filed against PayPal on December 31, 2024, seeking damages over $5 million.
- Several influencers, including Marques Brownlee, have publicly distanced themselves from Honey.
- PayPal defends Honey's practices, stating they follow industry standards.
Lessons Learned
- Transparency in Partnerships: Influencers and content creators should carefully evaluate promotional collaborations and insist on more openness on the ways in which browser extensions and other technologies work with their affiliate links.
- Ethical Technology Deployment: Companies must prioritize ethical considerations in their technological solutions, ensuring that innovations do not exploit users or partners for financial gain.
- Consumer Vigilance: Users should be more cautious about installing browser extensions and carefully review the terms of service. Independently searching for coupon codes rather than relying solely on automated tools can often lead to better deals.
- Affiliate Program Protection: Businesses running affiliate programs should implement robust tracking and fraud prevention measures to protect legitimate affiliates from commission hijacking.
- Regulatory Oversight: The controversy emphasizes how browser extensions and their data collection methods require closer examination and possibly regulation, particularly when they affect financial transactions.
Preventive Measures
- Consumers should independently search for coupon codes rather than relying solely on browser extensions
- Influencers should carefully review the terms of their promotional agreements
- Browser extensions and their data collection techniques need to be examined more closely.
-min%20(1).jpg)
